BDD - Writing better scenario

Software

arnauld-loyer
of 65
Description
Text
  • Behavior Driven Development Writing better scenario Arnauld LOYER — @aloyer Mastering Software Development EAre You really doing BDD?
  • Disclaimer No scenario has been harmed during the investigation github search: extension:feature travel/deal/… Most remarks are purely subjectives @aloyer
  • Let’s try to diagnose the maturity @aloyer Anti-Pattern … an antipattern was something that seems like a good idea when you begin, but leads you into trouble. http://martinfowler.com/bliki/AntiPattern.html http://martinfowler.com/bliki/AntiPattern.html
  • Having conversations with domain experts and discover unknowns and using examples to gain a shared understanding of the desired behavior @aloyer C
  • Ready?
  • Functional Tests or BDD ? @aloyer
  • Functional Tests or BDD ? @aloyer
  • Functional Tests or BDD ? @aloyer Acceptance
  • Feature: The Confluence server is up
 
 In order to make sure that Confluence has been installed and runs
 As a developer
 I want to access Confluence's home page
 
 Scenario: Developer accesses the home page
 Given the url of Confluences home page
 When a web user browses to the url
 Then the connection should be successful
 Then the page status should be OK
 Then the page should have the title "Confluence Setup Wizard - Confluence" https://github.com/xebia-france/chef-confluence-jira-crowd/blob/a26e29a85d1e75b9b612a560685940b40c971adc/test/integration/confluence-jira-crowd/cucumber/confluence_up.feature BDD ? @aloyer
  • Feature: The Confluence server is up
 
 In order to make sure that Confluence has been installed and runs
 As a developer
 I want to access Confluence's home page
 
 Scenario: Developer accesses the home page
 Given the url of Confluences home page
 When a web user browses to the url
 Then the connection should be successful
 Then the page status should be OK
 Then the page should have the title "Confluence Setup Wizard - Confluence" https://github.com/xebia-france/chef-confluence-jira-crowd/blob/a26e29a85d1e75b9b612a560685940b40c971adc/test/integration/confluence-jira-crowd/cucumber/confluence_up.feature Sanity CheckBDD ? behavior ? @aloyer
  • Feature: The Confluence server is up
 
 In order to make sure that Confluence has been installed and runs
 As a developer
 I want to access Confluence's home page
 
 Scenario: Developer accesses the home page
 Given the url of Confluences home page
 When a web user browses to the url
 Then the connection should be successful
 Then the page status should be OK
 Then the page should have the title "Confluence Setup Wizard - Confluence" https://github.com/xebia-france/chef-confluence-jira-crowd/blob/a26e29a85d1e75b9b612a560685940b40c971adc/test/integration/confluence-jira-crowd/cucumber/confluence_up.feature Sanity CheckBDD ? behavior ? @aloyer
  • @aloyer 12 Given-When-Then Then an outcome should be observed Given a context When an event happens 3 phases setup/arrang e exercise/act verify/assert Tips
  • Feature: Asset Manager
 
 @local-network
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be loaded
 Given I am testing "asset-manager" 
 And I am an authenticated API client
 When I visit "/assets/513a0efbed915d425e000002" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should see "120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be served
 Given I am testing "static" 
 When I visit "/media/ 513a0efbed915d425e000002/120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should get a content length of "212880" https://github.com/alphagov/smokey/blob/4c8fe739938e4a4b8b7bb393dfd485efd39dc034/features/asset_manager.feature BDD ? @aloyer
  • Feature: Asset Manager
 
 @local-network
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be loaded
 Given I am testing "asset-manager" 
 And I am an authenticated API client
 When I visit "/assets/513a0efbed915d425e000002" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should see "120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be served
 Given I am testing "static" 
 When I visit "/media/ 513a0efbed915d425e000002/120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should get a content length of "212880" https://github.com/alphagov/smokey/blob/4c8fe739938e4a4b8b7bb393dfd485efd39dc034/features/asset_manager.feature BDD ? Business Language? Technical Test web page Selenium technical deta ils @aloyer
  • Feature: Asset Manager
 
 @local-network
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be loaded
 Given I am testing "asset-manager" 
 And I am an authenticated API client
 When I visit "/assets/513a0efbed915d425e000002" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should see "120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be served
 Given I am testing "static" 
 When I visit "/media/ 513a0efbed915d425e000002/120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should get a content length of "212880" https://github.com/alphagov/smokey/blob/4c8fe739938e4a4b8b7bb393dfd485efd39dc034/features/asset_manager.feature BDD ? Technical Test differences? @aloyer different res ults? Unclear and non-sustainable
  • Tests BDD Business Tech’ Cucumber Behavior Let’s try to diagnose the maturity @aloyer
  • Should I use cucumber to write technical tests? Be pragmatic! Who will read the scenario? Are you ready to pay the cucumber overhead? compared to raw xUnit tests Do you really contribute to a shared knowledge or do you increase the business/technical gap? @aloyer
  • Who write the scenario ? &rea d @aloyer
  • L N C Tester Business/PO Developer? @aloyer
  • Feature: Asset Manager
 
 @local-network
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be loaded
 Given I am testing "asset-manager" 
 And I am an authenticated API client
 When I visit "/assets/513a0efbed915d425e000002" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should see "120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 
 @normal
 Scenario: check an asset can be served
 Given I am testing "static" 
 When I visit "/media/ 513a0efbed915d425e000002/120613_Albania_Travel_Advice_WEB_Ed2_jpeg.jpg" 
 Then I should get a 200 status code
 And I should get a content length of "212880" https://github.com/alphagov/smokey/blob/4c8fe739938e4a4b8b7bb393dfd485efd39dc034/features/asset_manager.feature Who wrote this ? @aloyer
  • @MoveToken
 Feature: Moving the token over the board
 
 As a player
 I want to move to new positions on the board
 So that I can get rich and win the game
 
 Scenario Outline: Moving a token after a single throw
 Given players token is at starting position 
 When player throws die1 and die2 
 Then players token moves to a new position 
 
 Examples:
 | startingPosition | die1 | die2 | newPosition | 
 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 
 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 
 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 
 Forgot the rule ? https://github.com/xebia/spec-by-example-2014-09-29/blob/4eabded6b22e816f6509a3ecd2c2180b62f4d73d/src/test/resources/monopoly/cucumber/MoveToken.feature @aloyer
  • @MoveToken
 Feature: Moving the token over the board
 
 As a player
 I want to move to new positions on the board
 So that I can get rich and win the game
 
 Scenario Outline: Moving a token after a single throw
 Given players token is at starting position 
 When player throws die1 and die2 
 Then players token moves to a new position 
 
 Examples:
 | startingPosition | die1 | die2 | newPosition | 
 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 
 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 
 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 
 Forgot the rule ? https://github.com/xebia/spec-by-example-2014-09-29/blob/4eabded6b22e816f6509a3ecd2c2180b62f4d73d/src/test/resources/monopoly/cucumber/MoveToken.feature @aloyer where is the r ule? The All-In-One Effect
  • @MoveToken
 Feature: Moving the token over the board
 
 As a player
 I want to move to new positions on the board
 So that I can get rich and win the game
 
 Scenario Outline: Moving a token after a single throw
 Given players token is at starting position 
 When player throws die1 and die2 
 Then players token moves to a new position 
 
 Examples:
 | startingPosition | die1 | die2 | newPosition | 
 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 
 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 
 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 
 Forgot the rule ? https://github.com/xebia/spec-by-example-2014-09-29/blob/4eabded6b22e816f6509a3ecd2c2180b62f4d73d/src/test/resources/monopoly/cucumber/MoveToken.feature where is the r ule? the outline effect @aloyer The All-In-One Effect
  • Feature: Deal team invitations
 
 1. A "My deals" section with
 The deals that I created
 The deals on which me or my team are deal leaders
 The deals on which me or my team are deal members
 
 2. A "Other deals" section with:
 The deals for which me or my team are "other contact"
 
 Scenario Outline: People invited into deal team directly
 Given the following deals have been created
 | Name | Creator | User leaders | User members | User other contacts | 
 | AF | John | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | 
 | KLM | Charlotte | John | Charlotte | Peter | 
 | IB | Charlotte | Charlotte | John | Peter | 
 | GW | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | John | 
 | TAP | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | |
 | TUN | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | Matthieu | 
 When logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section should have only 
 And the Other deals section should have only 
 
 Examples:
 | user | my deals | other deals | 
 | John | AF, KLM, IB | GW | 
 | Charlotte | AF, KLM, IB, GW, TAP, TUN | | 
 | Peter | AF, GW, TAP, TUN | KLM, IB | 
 | Matthieu | | TUN | 
 | Mariem | | | Is the rule obvious? @aloyer
  • Feature: Deal team invitations
 
 1. A "My deals" section with
 The deals that I created
 The deals on which me or my team are deal leaders
 The deals on which me or my team are deal members
 
 2. A "Other deals" section with:
 The deals for which me or my team are "other contact"
 
 Scenario Outline: People invited into deal team directly
 Given the following deals have been created
 | Name | Creator | User leaders | User members | User other contacts | 
 | AF | John | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | 
 | KLM | Charlotte | John | Charlotte | Peter | 
 | IB | Charlotte | Charlotte | John | Peter | 
 | GW | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | John | 
 | TAP | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | |
 | TUN | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | Matthieu | 
 When logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section should have only 
 And the Other deals section should have only 
 
 Examples:
 | user | my deals | other deals | 
 | John | AF, KLM, IB | GW | 
 | Charlotte | AF, KLM, IB, GW, TAP, TUN | | 
 | Peter | AF, GW, TAP, TUN | KLM, IB | 
 | Matthieu | | TUN | 
 | Mariem | | | Is the rule obvious?ARE S
  • Feature: Deal team invitations
 
 1. A "My deals" section with
 The deals that I created
 The deals on which me or my team are deal leaders
 The deals on which me or my team are deal members
 
 2. A "Other deals" section with:
 The deals for which me or my team are "other contact"
 
 Scenario Outline: People invited into deal team directly
 Given the following deals have been created
 | Name | Creator | User leaders | User members | User other contacts | 
 | AF | John | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | 
 | KLM | Charlotte | John | Charlotte | Peter | 
 | IB | Charlotte | Charlotte | John | Peter | 
 | GW | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | John | 
 | TAP | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | |
 | TUN | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | Matthieu | 
 When logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section should have only 
 And the Other deals section should have only 
 
 Examples:
 | user | my deals | other deals | 
 | John | AF, KLM, IB | GW | 
 | Charlotte | AF, KLM, IB, GW, TAP, TUN | | 
 | Peter | AF, GW, TAP, TUN | KLM, IB | 
 | Matthieu | | TUN | 
 | Mariem | | | what if … I belongs to multiple group? Is the rule obvious?ARE S the outline effect
  • Feature: Deal team invitations
 
 1. A "My deals" section with
 The deals that I created
 The deals on which me or my team are deal leaders
 The deals on which me or my team are deal members
 
 2. A "Other deals" section with:
 The deals for which me or my team are "other contact"
 
 Scenario Outline: People invited into deal team directly
 Given the following deals have been created
 | Name | Creator | User leaders | User members | User other contacts | 
 | AF | John | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | 
 | KLM | Charlotte | John | Charlotte | Peter | 
 | IB | Charlotte | Charlotte | John | Peter | 
 | GW | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | John | 
 | TAP | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | |
 | TUN | Diego | Charlotte | Peter | Matthieu | 
 When logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section should have only 
 And the Other deals section should have only 
 
 Examples:
 | user | my deals | other deals | 
 | John | AF, KLM, IB | GW | 
 | Charlotte | AF, KLM, IB, GW, TAP, TUN | | 
 | Peter | AF, GW, TAP, TUN | KLM, IB | 
 | Matthieu | | TUN | 
 | Mariem | | | what if … I belongs to multiple group? Is the rule obvious?ARE S the outline effect
  • Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 As an FO
 I need to see my deals ordered in the way that fits my function
 In order to have a clear view of the most important or urgent deals.
 
 Clarifications:
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For cards display, the oldest cards will be on the top and for cards on the same row, the oldest card will be on the left.
 For table display, the oldest cards will on the top.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | Aircraft AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | Aircraft KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | Aircraft TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as Aircraft KLM,Aircraft TUN,Aircraft AF
 the A4 rule ? @aloyer
  • Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 As an FO
 I need to see my deals ordered in the way that fits my function
 In order to have a clear view of the most important or urgent deals.
 
 Clarifications:
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For cards display, the oldest cards will be on the top and for cards on the same row, the oldest card will be on the left.
 For table display, the oldest cards will on the top.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | Aircraft AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | Aircraft KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | Aircraft TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as Aircraft KLM,Aircraft TUN,Aircraft AF
 the A4 rule ? Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as KLM, TUN, AF
  • Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 As an FO
 I need to see my deals ordered in the way that fits my function
 In order to have a clear view of the most important or urgent deals.
 
 Clarifications:
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For cards display, the oldest cards will be on the top and for cards on the same row, the oldest card will be on the left.
 For table display, the oldest cards will on the top.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | Aircraft AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | Aircraft KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | Aircraft TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as Aircraft KLM,Aircraft TUN,Aircraft AF
 the A4 rule ? Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as KLM, TUN, AF
  • Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 As an FO
 I need to see my deals ordered in the way that fits my function
 In order to have a clear view of the most important or urgent deals.
 
 Clarifications:
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For cards display, the oldest cards will be on the top and for cards on the same row, the oldest card will be on the left.
 For table display, the oldest cards will on the top.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | Aircraft AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | Aircraft KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | Aircraft TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as Aircraft KLM,Aircraft TUN,Aircraft AF
 the A4 rule ? Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as KLM, TUN, AF B
  • Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 As an FO
 I need to see my deals ordered in the way that fits my function
 In order to have a clear view of the most important or urgent deals.
 
 Clarifications:
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For cards display, the oldest cards will be on the top and for cards on the same row, the oldest card will be on the left.
 For table display, the oldest cards will on the top.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | client name | total amount | creator | user leaders | user members | user other contacts | expected closing date | pricing status | Credit approval status | Lso deal code | Cwf request code | stage | confidentiality level | 
 | Aircraft AF | Air France | 150000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Diego | May 12, 2016 | true | Not submitted | L0377450 | 2015_07_001105 | Marketing | My Team | 
 | Aircraft KLM | KLM | 15000000 | Charlotte | Johny | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 11, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_08_001105 | Bidding | Confidential | 
 | Aircraft TUN | Tunisair | 16000000 | Johny | Charlotte | Charlotte | Peter | Jul 12, 2014 | false | In progress | L0377451 | 2015_09_001105 | Bidding | My Team | 
 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as Aircraft KLM,Aircraft TUN,Aircraft AF
 the A4 rule ? Feature: Deals display order in the home page
 Deals should be ordered by expected closing date, the first deals displayed should be the ones with the oldest expected closing date.
 For deals with the same expected closing date, they should be ordered by deal name
 
 Scenario: Deals display order
 Given the following deals
 | name | expected closing date | 
 | AF | May 12, 2016 | 
 | KLM | Jul 11, 2014 | 
 | TUN | Jul 12, 2014 | 
 When Charlotte logs into the platform
 Then the My deals section must be ordered as KLM, TUN, AF O
  • Tests BDD Business Tech’ Cucumber Behavior Let’s try to diagnose the maturity @aloyer
  • Cucumber 3 Amigos Tests BDD Business Tech’ Behavior Let’s try to diagnose the maturity @aloyer
  • Cucumber 3 Amigos Tests BDD Business Tech’ Behavior Let’s try to diagnose the maturity Scenario @aloyer
  • Cucumber Scenario 3 Amigos Driven Development Tests BDD Business Tech’ Behavior Let’s try to diagnose the maturity @aloyer
  • Scenario should be written using the Business Language Together What is the intent? Have I understood the expected behavior? Do I clearly understand the rule when reading a scenario? How many rules are exposed within the scenario? @aloyer Try to limit to One rule per scenario
  • What level of details ? Writing better scenario @aloyer
  • @BuyingProperties
 Feature: Buying properties
 
 As a player
 I want to buy properties
 So that I can ask rent when my opponents land on it
 
 Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed
 
 
 Scenario: No sufficient funds
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are not sufficient
 Then I am not able to buy the property
 https://github.com/xebia/workshop-agile-testing/blob/8705e3f93270662285cd9c8ec8c24e5ac957f3ed/src/test/resources/features/BuyingProperties.feature Enough details ? @aloyer
  • @BuyingProperties
 Feature: Buying properties
 
 As a player
 I want to buy properties
 So that I can ask rent when my opponents land on it
 
 Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed
 
 
 Scenario: No sufficient funds
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are not sufficient
 Then I am not able to buy the property
 https://github.com/xebia/workshop-agile-testing/blob/8705e3f93270662285cd9c8ec8c24e5ac957f3ed/src/test/resources/features/BuyingProperties.feature Enough details ? too declarative which one? what does it mean? « Pay » is an outcome? Choose? @aloyer
  • Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed @aloyer
  • Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed 
 @default_properties
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property
 And my funds are 2000
 When I buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased to 1800 @aloyer
  • Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed to pay is an action (when) not an outcome (then) value can be changed 
 @default_properties
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property
 And my funds are 2000
 When I buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased to 1800 can help to project to other case Can it always be applied? @aloyer
  • Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed 
 @default_properties
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property
 And my funds are 2000
 When I buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased to 1800 @Then("^my funds should be (?:decreased to |increased to )?(\\d+)$") 
 public void my_funds_should_be_(int amount) @aloyer
  • Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed @default_properties
 Scenario: Default properties - by tag
 Then the available properties should be at least:
 | name | price | 
 | east | 150 | 
 | west | 200 | 
 | north | 100 | 
 | south | 40 | 
 @default_properties
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property
 And my funds are 2000
 When I buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased to 1800 @aloyer
  • Scenario: Default properties - explicit
 Given the default properties are used
 Then the available properties should be at least:
 | name | price | 
 | east | 150 | 
 | west | 200 | 
 | north | 100 | 
 | south | 40 | Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed @default_properties
 Scenario: Default properties - by tag
 Then the available properties should be at least:
 | name | price | 
 | east | 150 | 
 | west | 200 | 
 | north | 100 | 
 | south | 40 | 
 @default_properties
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property
 And my funds are 2000
 When I buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased to 1800 @aloyer
  • Scenario: Buying property
 Given I land on unowned property
 And my funds are sufficient
 When I choose to buy the property
 Then I pay the printed price
 And I receive the title deed 
 @default_properties @default_player
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property that cost 180
 When I choose to buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased by 180 
 @default_properties
 Scenario: Buying property
 
 Given I land on unowned "west" property
 And my funds are 2000
 When I buy the property
 And I pay the printed price
 Then I should receive the "west" title deed
 And my funds should be decreased to 1800 @aloyer
  • Scenario: Create a Stock option Given the following option: | Property | Value | | delivery | Cash | | bo strike | no | | floor | 0 | | forex constat | - | | forex constat date | 1970-JAN-01 | | forex start date | 1970-JAN-01 | | guaranteed currency | EUR | | guaranteed rate | 0 | | initial spot | 0 | ... | maturity | 2020-FEB-05 | | option quotity | 1 | | strike | 2500 | | underlying id | SOCIETE-GLE_X | | underlying type | Stock | And the option’s restriking infos is: | Property | Value | | floating rate | no | | fixed rate | no | ... | last update | | | first trading date | | | rate offset | 0.0 | When I create the option Then the option id should be filled in Scenario: Create a Fund option Given the following option: | Property | Value | | delivery | Cash | | bo strike | no | | floor | 0 | | forex constat | - | | forex constat date | 1970-JAN-01 | | forex start date | 1970-JAN-01 | | guaranteed currency | EUR | | guaranteed rate | 0 | | initial spot | 0 | ... | maturity | 2020-FEB-05 | | option quotity | 1 | | strike | 2500 | | underlying id | SOCIETE-GLE_X | | underlying type | Fund | And the option’s restriking infos is: | Property | Value | | floating rate | no | | fixed rate | no | ... | last update | | | first trading date | | | rate offset | 0.0 | When I create the option Then the option id should be filled in ~53 properties ~20 properties @aloyer Too much details ?
  • Scenario: Create an external OTC deal Given the following option: | Property | Value | | delivery | Cash | | bo strike | no | | floor | 0 | | forex constat | - | | forex constat date | 1970-JAN-01 | | forex start date | 1970-JAN-01 | | guaranteed currency | EUR | | guaranteed rate | 0 | | initial spot | 0 | ... | maturity | 2020-FEB-05 | | option quotity | 1 | | strike | 2500 | | underlying id | SOCIETE-GLE_X | | underlying type | Stock | And the option’s restriking infos is: | Property | Value | | floating rate | no | | fixed rate | no | ... | last update | | | first trading date | | | rate offset | 0.0 | And an external OTC deal: | Property | Value | | category | OTC | | delivery | - | | initial price | 0 | | internal market | yes | | last update | | ... | quantity | 6000 | | remaining quantity | 6000 | And the deal’s counter part is: | Property | Value | | confirm mode | ST | | market maker | Nefertiti | ... And the deal’s sales part is: | Property | Value | | accounting center | - | | derogation | no | ... And the deal’s collateral is: | Property | Value | | IA | no | | currency | - | ... When I create the option And I create the deal with the created option Then the deal id should be filled in ~58 ~5 ~58 ~22 @aloyer Too much details ?
  • Scenario: Standard option Given a standard option with no specifics Then the option should have the following properties: | Property | Value | | delivery | Cash | | bo strike | no | | floor | 0 | | forex constat | - | | forex constat date | 1970-JAN-01 | | forex start date | 1970-JAN-01 | | guaranteed currency | EUR | | guaranteed rate | 0 | | initial spot | 0 | ... | maturity | 2020-FEB-05 | | option quotity | 1 | | strike | 2500 | | underlying id | SOCIETE-GLE_X | | underlying type | Stock | | restriking infos | | ~53 properties Scenario: Standard option’s restriking infos Given a standard option’s restriking infos Then the option’s restriking infos should be: | Property | Value | | floating rate | no | | fixed rate | no | ... | last update | | | first trading date | | | rate offset | 0.0 | ~20 @aloyer Too much details ? use persona Persona is ch ecked AND documen ted
  • Scenario: Create a Stock option Given the following option: | Property | Value | | delivery | Cash | | bo strike | no | | floor | 0 | | forex constat | - | | forex constat date | 1970-JAN-01 | | forex start date | 1970-JAN-01 | | guaranteed currency | EUR | | guaranteed rate | 0 | | initial spot | 0 | ... | maturity | 2020-FEB-05 | | option quotity | 1 | | strike | 2500 | | underlying id | SOCIETE-GLE_X | | underlying type | Stock | And the option’s restriking infos is: | Property | Value | | floating rate | no | | fixed rate | no | ... | last update | | | first trading date | | | rate offset | 0.0 | When I create the option Then the option id should be filled in Scenario: Create a Stock Option Given a standard option with the following specifics: | underlying type | underlying id | | Stock | SOCIETE-GLE_X | When I create the option Then the option id should be filled in @aloyer Too much details ? use persona
  • Enough details ? http://blog.thiga.fr/product-management/bdd-gherkin-pour-ecrire-vos-user-stories/ @aloyer
  • Enough details ? http://blog.thiga.fr/product-management/bdd-gherkin-pour-ecrire-vos-user-stories/ @aloyer Lot of details there no details! no way to challe nge the result
  • Enough details ? http://blog.thiga.fr/product-management/bdd-gherkin-pour-ecrire-vos-user-stories/ @aloyer Lot of details there, 6 decimals precision! GPS? GPS? - destination is usually an address!
  • Enough details ? http://blog.thiga.fr/product-management/bdd-gherkin-pour-ecrire-vos-user-stories/ @aloyer why no date there but it is explicit the re
  • Enough details ? http://blog.thiga.fr/product-management/bdd-gherkin-pour-ecrire-vos-user-stories/ @aloyer Why would such result exist?
  • @aloyer
  • @aloyer # language: fr
 Fonctionnalité:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 @reseau_simplifié
 Scénario: Obtenir une feuille de l'itinéraire par d'arrivée
 
 2 Place de la Défense: 48.893195, 2.238945
 
 Etant donné que je veux aller de "48.893195, 2.238945" au "25 rue du Louvre, Paris" 
 Et que je veux partir à 9h30 avec les options suivantes:
 | X | Transport en commun | 
 | X | Le plus rapide | 
 | | Le moins de changement | 
 Alors je devrais obtenir la feuille de route suivante:
 | Type | Heure | Localisation | Transport | Durée | Distance | 
 | départ | 9h30 | 2 Place de la Défense | Pied | ~5min | 400m | 
 | - | 9h37 | La Défense | RER A vers Vincennes | 10min | - | 
 | - | 9h47 | Châtelet - Les Halles | Pied | ~7min | 550m | 
 | arrivée | 9h54 | 25 rue du Louve | - | - | - |
  • @aloyer # language: fr
 Fonctionnalité:
 
 
 
 Scénario: Rer A dans le réseau de transport simplifié
 
 Etant donné le réseau de transport simplifié "Parisien" 
 Alors le Rer A devrait passer toutes les 10mins à "la Défense" à partir de 5h37
 Alors les temps de transport cumulés depuis "la Défense" devraient être:
 | Charles de Gaulle Etoile | 5min | 
 | Auber | 7min | 
 | Chatelet les Halles | 10min | 
 
 
 @reseau_simplifié
 Scénario: Obtenir une feuille de l'itinéraire par d'arrivée
 
 2 Place de la Défense: 48.893195, 2.238945
 
 Etant donné que je veux aller de "48.893195, 2.238945" au "25 rue du Louvre, Paris" 
 Et que je veux partir à 9h30 avec les options suivantes:
 | X | Transport en commun | 
 | X | Le plus rapide | 
 | | Le moins de changement | 
 Alors je devrais obtenir la feuille de route suivante:
 | Type | Heure | Localisation | Transport | Durée | Distance | 
 | départ | 9h30 | 2 Place de la Défense | Pied | ~5min | 400m | 
 | - | 9h37 | La Défense | RER A vers Vincennes | 10min | - | 
 | - | 9h47 | Châtelet - Les Halles | Pied | ~7min | 550m | 
 | arrivée | 9h54 | 25 rue du Louve | - | - | - |
  • To be continued… @aloyer # language: fr
 Fonctionnalité:
 
 Scénario: Le métro 1 dans le réseau de transport simplifié
 
 Etant donné le réseau de transport simplifié "Parisien" 
 Alors le métro 1 devrait passer dans chaque station toutes les 5mins à partir de 6h00
 
 Scénario: Rer A dans le réseau de transport simplifié
 
 Etant donné le réseau de transport simplifié "Parisien" 
 Alors le Rer A devrait passer toutes les 10mins à "la Défense" à partir de 5h37
 Alors les temps de transport cumulés depuis "la Défense" devraient être:
 | Charles de Gaulle Etoile | 5min | 
 | Auber | 7min | 
 | Chatelet les Halles | 10min | 
 
 
 @reseau_simplifié
 Scénario: Obtenir une feuille de l'itinéraire par d'arrivée
 
 2 Place de la Défense: 48.893195, 2.238945
 
 Etant donné que je veux aller de "48.893195, 2.238945" au "25 rue du Louvre, Paris" 
 Et que je veux partir à 9h30 avec les options suivantes:
 | X | Transport en commun | 
 | X | Le plus rapide | 
 | | Le moins de changement | 
 Alors je devrais obtenir la feuille de route suivante:
 | Type | Heure | Localisation | Transport | Durée | Distance | 
 | départ | 9h30 | 2 Place de la Défense | Pied | ~5min | 400m | 
 | - | 9h37 | La Défense | RER A vers Vincennes | 10min | - | 
 | - | 9h47 | Châtelet - Les Halles | Pied | ~7min | 550m | 
 | arrivée | 9h54 | 25 rue du Louve | - | - | - |
  • Adjust the cursor @aloyer declarative imperative too much detailsn ot enough details
  • Adjust the cursor @aloyer declarative imperative too much detailsn ot enough details Together!
  • Remove ambiguities but keep scenario short Am I concrete enough on the expected behavior? Signal vs noise ratio? What if the scenario has more details? @aloyer Rely on Persona/Defaults… Do Scenario Review…
  • is NOT About is About BDD ! " KL a tool for test automation communication acceptance criteriaL K behavior
  • Questions? Arnauld LOYER — @aloyer Q Training Coaching /[TBD]DD/ Testing/Clean Code Mastering Software Development
Comments
Top